Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Intern Med ; 2023 May 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236815

RESUMEN

Objective We evaluated the clinical differences in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients between the sixth wave with the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 dominant variant (from January to April 2022) and seventh wave with the Omicron BA.5 dominant variant (from July to August 2022). Methods This retrospective, single-center, observational study included COVID-19 patients admitted to our institution in the sixth wave (sixth-wave group) and the seventh wave (seventh-wave group). Inter-group comparisons of clinical presentations, the prognosis, and proportion of nosocomial infections were performed. Results A total of 190 patients were included (93 and 97 patients in the sixth- and seventh-wave groups, respectively). While there were no significant differences in severity, significantly more patients developed pneumonia caused by COVID-19 in the sixth-wave group than in the seventh-wave group. Although there was no marked difference in in-hospital deaths, more patients died from COVID-19 in the sixth-wave group than in the seventh-wave group. There were significantly more COVID-19 inpatients with nosocomial infections in the seventh-wave group than in the sixth-wave group. Pneumonia from COVID-19 was significantly more severe in the sixth-wave group than in the seventh-wave group. Conclusions COVID-19 patients in the seventh wave are at a lower risk of pneumonia than those in the sixth wave. However, even in the seventh wave, patients with underlying diseases have a risk of death because of the exacerbation of underlying diseases triggered by COVID-19.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0282337, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2267593

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to evaluate visualization-based training's effects on lung auscultation during clinical clerkship (CC) in the Department of Respiratory Medicine on student skills and confidence. METHODS: The study period was December 2020-November 2021. Overall, 65 students attended a lecture on lung auscultation featuring a simulator (Mr. Lung™). Among them, 35 (visualization group) received additional training wherein they were asked to mentally visualize lung sounds using a graphical visualized lung sounds diagram as an example. All students answered questions on their self-efficacy regarding lung auscultation before and after four weeks of CC. They also took a lung auscultation test with the simulator at the beginning of CC (pre-test) and on the last day of the third week (post-test) (maximum score: 25). We compared the answers in the questionnaire and the test scores between the visualization group and students who only attended the lecture (control group, n = 30). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and analysis of covariance were used to compare the answers to the questionnaire about confidence in lung auscultation and the scores of the lung auscultation tests before and after the training. RESULTS: Confidence in auscultation of lung sounds significantly increased in both groups (five-point Likert scale, visualization group: pre-questionnaire median 1 [Interquartile range 1] to post-questionnaire 3 [1], p<0.001; control group: 2 [1] to 3 [1], p<0.001) and was significantly higher in the visualization than in the control group. Test scores increased in both groups (visualization group: pre-test 11 [2] to post-test 15 [4], p<0.001; control group: 11 [5] to 14 [4], p<0.001). However, there were no differences between both groups' pre and post-tests scores (p = 0.623). CONCLUSION: Visualizing lung sounds may increase medical students' confidence in their lung auscultation skills; this may reduce their resistance to lung auscultation and encourage the repeated auscultation necessary to further improve their long-term auscultation abilities.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Ruidos Respiratorios , Auscultación , Pulmón , Competencia Clínica , Auscultación Cardíaca
3.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(33): e2203437119, 2022 08 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1960624

RESUMEN

The mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is strongly correlated with pulmonary vascular pathology accompanied by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-triggered immune dysregulation and aberrant activation of platelets. We combined histological analyses using field emission scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses of the lungs from autopsy samples and single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to investigate the pathogenesis of vasculitis and immunothrombosis in COVID-19. We found that SARS-CoV-2 accumulated in the pulmonary vessels, causing exudative vasculitis accompanied by the emergence of thrombospondin-1-expressing noncanonical monocytes and the formation of myosin light chain 9 (Myl9)-containing microthrombi in the lung of COVID-19 patients with fatal disease. The amount of plasma Myl9 in COVID-19 was correlated with the clinical severity, and measuring plasma Myl9 together with other markers allowed us to predict the severity of the disease more accurately. This study provides detailed insight into the pathogenesis of vasculitis and immunothrombosis, which may lead to optimal medical treatment for COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmón , Cadenas Ligeras de Miosina , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tromboinflamación , Vasculitis , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/patología , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Pulmón/metabolismo , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/virología , Cadenas Ligeras de Miosina/sangre , RNA-Seq , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Espectrometría por Rayos X , Tromboinflamación/patología , Tromboinflamación/virología , Vasculitis/patología , Vasculitis/virología
4.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 453, 2022 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has induced an urgent need to train medical students not only in infection prevention control but also in the treatment of infectious diseases, including COVID-19. This study evaluates the impact of simulated clinical practice with peer role-plays and a lecture on clinical education for COVID-19. METHODS: The sample for the study included 82 fourth- and fifth-year medical students undergoing clinical clerkship in respiratory medicine. They answered questionnaires and participated in semi-structured focus group interviews (FGIs) regarding the advantages of simulated clinical practice with peer role-plays and lectures on clinical education for COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 75 students participated in the COVID-19 education program between January and November 2021. The responses to the questionnaire revealed that the satisfaction level of students with COVID-19 education was high. No significant change was found among students concerning fear of COVID-19 before and after the program. The degree of burden of handling information on COVID-19 reduced significantly, while the degree with respect to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including appropriate wearing and removing of PPE, and care of patients with confirmed COVID-19 while taking steps to prevent infection, exhibited a decreasing trend. Nine FGIs were conducted (n = 74). The advantages of simulated clinical practice were segregated into five categories (infection prevention control, educational methods, burden on healthcare providers, self-reflection, and fear of COVID-19); and that of the lecture were segregated into four categories (information literacy, knowledge of COVID-19, educational methods, and self-reflection). CONCLUSIONS: Simulated clinical practice with peer role-plays and the lecture pertaining to COVID-19 can prove to be efficient and safe methods for learning about COVID-19 infection and prevention control for medical students. They can reduce the burden of COVID-19 patients' care. Moreover, they can also provide an opportunity for self-reflection, realize the burden of medical care, and acquire relevant information.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prácticas Clínicas , Estudiantes de Medicina , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Equipo de Protección Personal
5.
Am J Case Rep ; 23: e936832, 2022 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1934627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Although sotrovimab reduces the risk of hospitalization or death due to COVID-19, there have been few reports of its use in clinical practice. Particularly, information on the effectiveness of sotrovimab against the omicron variant of the virus is limited. We present 10 cases of COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab at our unit between December 2021 and February 2022. CASE REPORT The age of the patients ranged from 32 to 81 years (median: 40 years). The comorbidities included lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis, and AIDS. Two of the patients were also organ recipients. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was above 97% in all patients. None of the patients presented with pneumonia on admission. However, blood test results showed that all patients had risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes. The interval from symptom onset to sotrovimab administration and resolution ranged from 2 to 5 days (median: 2 days) and 2 to 15 days (median: 5 days), respectively. Only 1 patient developed pneumonia and was treated with remdesivir after sotrovimab administration. However, this patient did not require oxygen therapy. Although no moderate to severe adverse events were observed, a mild adverse event was observed in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS Sotrovimab could be safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 in patients with a variety of underlying diseases and who are at high risk of severe disease outcomes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Am J Case Rep ; 23: e936034, 2022 May 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1841694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is treated using antiviral and immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, patients treated for COVID-19 may have an increased risk of secondary infection and a masked inflammatory response. We present a case of a deep neck abscess caused by pyogenic sternoclavicular arthritis during treatment for COVID-19. CASE REPORT A 55-year-old man with COVID-19 was admitted to the hospital with hypoxemia. He was then treated with remdesivir, tocilizumab, and dexamethasone and was placed in the prone position. When his condition stabilized, pain in the left shoulder appeared. There was no fever or elevation in inflammation markers, and he was administered analgesics. However, the pain worsened and redness of the left neck appeared. Plain computed tomography (CT) showed swelling of the left neck muscles. Because cellulitis was suspected, he was treated with antibiotics, but his symptoms did not improve. Three days after the plain CT, contrast-enhanced CT showed sternoclavicular arthritis, deep neck abscess, and mediastinal abscess. Therefore, an emergency incisional drainage was performed under general anesthesia. Wound cleaning and drainage were continued after surgery, and after drainage tubes were removed, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 17. CONCLUSIONS Cervical infections after COVID-19 treatment have been reported in a few cases. Particularly, deep neck abscesses require more attention since they could be fatal if not treated immediately. If a secondary infection is suspected in a patient treated with immunosuppressive drugs for COVID-19, a thorough physical examination should be performed to avoid misdiagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Coinfección , Absceso/diagnóstico , Absceso/etiología , Absceso/terapia , Artritis Infecciosa/terapia , Drenaje , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor
7.
Cell ; 185(12): 2103-2115.e19, 2022 06 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1814233

RESUMEN

Soon after the emergence and global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage BA.1, another Omicron lineage, BA.2, began outcompeting BA.1. The results of statistical analysis showed that the effective reproduction number of BA.2 is 1.4-fold higher than that of BA.1. Neutralization experiments revealed that immunity induced by COVID vaccines widely administered to human populations is not effective against BA.2, similar to BA.1, and that the antigenicity of BA.2 is notably different from that of BA.1. Cell culture experiments showed that the BA.2 spike confers higher replication efficacy in human nasal epithelial cells and is more efficient in mediating syncytia formation than the BA.1 spike. Furthermore, infection experiments using hamsters indicated that the BA.2 spike-bearing virus is more pathogenic than the BA.1 spike-bearing virus. Altogether, the results of our multiscale investigations suggest that the risk of BA.2 to global health is potentially higher than that of BA.1.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Animales , COVID-19/virología , Cricetinae , Células Epiteliales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/genética
10.
Mol Psychiatry ; 27(4): 1898-1907, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1612180

RESUMEN

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) accelerates the discovery of prophylactic and therapeutic drugs for persons infected with the virus. Drug repurposing for the COVID-19 pandemic has received particular attention. Increasing clinical data suggest that antidepressant use in early-stage subjects with COVID-19 might be associated with a reduced risk of intubation or death. Among the antidepressants, fluvoxamine is the most attractive drug for mild to moderate subjects with COVID-19. In this article, we review the mechanisms of action (i.e., serotonin transporter, sigma-1 receptor, and acid sphingomyelinase) of fluvoxamine for COVID-19. Furthermore, we discuss a possible link between maternal COVID-19 infection and a risk for neuropsychiatric disorders (i.e., autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia) in offspring.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Antidepresivos/farmacología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluvoxamina/farmacología , Fluvoxamina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
11.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0256977, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1394551

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Although most patients with COVID-19 develop asymptomatic or mild disease, some patients develop severe disease. The effectiveness of various therapeutic agents, including antiviral drugs, steroids, and anti-inflammatories for COVID-19, have been being confirmed. The effect of administering steroids in early disease is unclear. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and risk of exacerbation of steroids administered preceding antiviral drugs in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, observational study included consecutive patients with COVID-19 between March 2020 and March 2021. Patients were divided into a steroids-first group and antiviral-drugs-first group. Mortality, duration of hospitalization, incidence rate and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induction of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients were admitted during the study period. After excluding patients who received symptomatic treatment only, who were taking immunosuppressive drugs, or who were administered antiviral drugs only, 68 patients were included in the analysis, 16 in the steroids-first group and 52 in the antiviral-drugs-first group. The rate of intubation, ICU admission and ECMO induction were significantly higher in the steroids-first group than in the antiviral-drugs-first group (81.3% vs. 33.3, p<0.001, 75.0% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001, and 31.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.017, respectively). Furthermore, patients who received steroids within ten days after starting antiviral drugs had significantly lower rates of ICU admission, intubation, and ECMO induction. (81.3% vs. 42.9% p = 0.011, 75.0% vs. 37.1% p = 0.012, and 31.3% vs. 8.6% p = 0.039, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Administering steroids prior to antiviral drugs soon after symptom onset can aggravate disease severity. When administration of steroids is considered soon after symptom onset, it may be safer to initiate antiviral drugs first.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/virología , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 272(1): 161-163, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1391862
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA